Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
BEA WebLogic 8.1 xfire.typeMappingRegistry fix Number of Views List User Group Membership in Reports Number of Views Rules are not triggered after unification run in RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle Number of Views Error: 'HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error' while performing WebSSO between Asserting Party (AP) and Relying Party (RP) Number of Views Error encountered in Relying Party servlet: (404)Not Found' appears in web browser when using RSA Federated Identity Manag… Number of Views
Trending Articles
RSA MFA Agent 2.3.6 for Microsoft Windows Installation and Administration Guide RSA Authentication Manager 8.7 SP2 Setup and Configuration Guide How to Download OTP Token Seed Files from myRSA How to factory reset an RSA Authentication Manager 8.x hardware appliance without a factory reset button from the Operatio… RSA MFA Agent 2.5 for Microsoft Windows Installation and Administration Guide
Don't see what you're looking for?
