Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
Are there any illegal characters that must not be included in role names? Number of Views Are there any Macintosh capable browsers supported? Number of Views Error: 'The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI' in RSA Federated Identity Manager (FIM) Number of Views When multi-step review is generated, NewReviewGeneratedEvent is triggered twice for second step review sending duplicate e… Number of Views RSA July Release Announcements Number of Views
Trending Articles
RSA Authentication Manager Upgrade Process How to manipulate imported RSA SecurID Software Token(s) on an iPhone or iPad device Download RSA SecurID Access Cloud User Event audit logs using Cloud Administration REST API CLU RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Release Notes (January 2026) AFX Server Fails to Start with 'Could Not Build a Validated Path' and 'Timed Out Waiting for AFX Applications to Start' in…
Don't see what you're looking for?
