Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Last Modified: 2023-10-06
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
Are there any Macintosh capable browsers supported? Number of Views Are there any illegal characters that must not be included in role names? Number of Views Are there any restrictions to using StealthAUDIT with the RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle license of StealthAUDIT? Number of Views Launch the Identity Router for Amazon Web Services Number of Views After updating the certificates for RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle, WildFly reports error: JBAS015299: The KeyStore /… Number of Views
Trending Articles
How to manipulate imported RSA SecurID Software Token(s) on an iPhone or iPad device Troubleshooting AFX Connector issues in RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle Authentication Manager Security Console and Operations Console Inaccessible After Certificate Update How to Forward RSA Authentication Manager 8.4 or Later Logs to Multiple Syslog Servers Using rsyslog RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Patches and Hotfixes Readme
Don't see what you're looking for?
